Section 135 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Explained!


The word ‘whoever’ should be read subject to what has been provided in section 139 of the Code.


The word ‘abets’ should be understood in the sense given under section 107 of the Code.


The word ‘desertion’ has not been defined under the Code. But it may mean absence from duty of such a person as stated in this section who has no intention of returning to the job to rejoin his duties. If he has proceeded on leave and overstays without further extension it is a case of absence from duty without leave. But once he so overstays without any intention to rejoin his duties, his doing so becomes unlawful, and he becomes a deserter.

The offence under this section is cognizable, bailable and non-compoundable, and is triable by metropolitan magistrate or magistrate of the first or second class.

Related Articles

Ingredients of Section 121-A of IPC – “Conspiracy to commit offences”

Ingredients of the section: Following ingredients are necessary: — (1) Conspiracy within or without India to commit any offence punishable by Section 121; or (2) Conspiracy to overawe by means of criminal force; or show of criminal force the Central Government or any State Government. In the case of Maganlal Radhakrishan v. Emperor, the following […]
Read more

Accident – Section 80 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Explained!

(a) Without criminal intention or knowledge; (b) In the doing of a lawful act— (i) by lawful manner, (ii) By lawful means, and (iii) With proper care and caution. Illustrations: (i) A is at work with a hatchet; the head flies off and kills a man. Here if there was no want of proper caution […]
Read more
Search for: