Summary of Section 118 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Explained!

The section states that whenever there is an intention on the part of an abettor to facilitate the commission of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, or he knows it to be likely that he will thereby facilitate the commission of such an offence as mentioned above, and he voluntarily conceals, either by an act or by an illegal omission, the existence of a design to commit such offence or makes a representation about which he has knowledge that it is false respecting such design, he shall be punished, if the offence be committed, with simple or rigorous imprisonment extending up to seven years, or, if the offence be not committed, with simple or rigorous imprisonment extending up to three years, and in both the abovementioned cases shall also be liable to fine.

The words ‘voluntarily’ and ‘illegal‘ have been defined under sections 39 and 43 of the Code respectively. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 vide section 39 imposes a legal duty on the public to give information of certain offences, and vide section 40 a legal duty on officers employed in connection with the affairs of a village to make certain report.

If a person is not legally bound to inform the existence of a design and does not voluntarily conceal the existence of a design, he cannot be held guilty under this section. It must be proved that the voluntary concealment by any act or illegal omission was intended to facilitate or known to be likely to facilitate the commission of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life. No conviction can be maintained if the existence of a design to commit such offence or making of any representation which the abettor knows to be false respecting such design is not proved.

The offence under this section is non-bailable if concealment is of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life. It is bailable if the offence is not committed.

Related Articles

Short Essay on the Hobbes and Sevigne Theory of Law

Therefore, man is driven by evident necessity to join some authority to protect himself. According to him, it is men and arms that are responsible for the maintenance of law and order in the State. According to this theory, law has its source not in custom, not in consent but in the will and power […]
Read more

Explanation of the Conditions of Hindu Marriage under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

In all the cases of bigamy the strict proof of solemnization of marriage comprising essential customary rites and ceremonies is required. Santi Deb Berma v. Kanchan Prava Devi, AIR 1991 SC 816. The wife of the bigamous marriage has no legal status, but can file for a decree of nullity to facilitate her to have […]
Read more
Search for: