What are the Changes Meant to Simplify the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 and Eliminate Speculative Litigation?

The adoption, may be made long after the vesting and speculative litigation launched to upset longstanding titles. Ruinous litigation of this kind is not now possible for the doctrine of relation back because it has been abolished by the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. An adoption does not divest any vested rights under the new law.

(ii) Maternal Affiliation Clarified:

Formerly there were many complications in regard to maternal affiliation for an adopted child. Who is the adoptive mother when the adopter has many wives or when the adoption is made by a widower or when a bachelor adopts a son and then marries a woman? Doubts on such points have now been set at rest by clearly lying down in s. 14 how the adoptive mother is to be determined in such cases.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

(iii) Widow’s Power of Adoptions:

The Shastric law was based upon a text of Vasishtha requiring a woman to adopt only with the consent of her husband. The text gave rise to four different interpre­tations. As a consequence of this the Mithila School of law did not allow a widow to adopt at all while the Benaras and Bengal Schools allowed her to adopt only if her husband has given her during his life­time an express authority to adopt.

Under the Dravida School even in the absence of such authority a widow could adopt with assent of the Sapindas of the husband; while a widow governed by the Maharashtra School was in a still more favourable position for she needed no authority at all from anyone to make a valid adoption. Now the law has been simplified and the law governing the widow under the Maharashtra School has been applied to all widows.

The result is a widow can now adopt without anybody’s assent. The large volume of litigation under the old law as to motives of widow, refusal of consent by Sapindas, genuineness of husband’s authority etc, is now a thing of the past.

(iv) Abolition of the Rule in Bhoobun Moyee’s Case:

The Privy Council laid down a rule as to termination of a widow’s power to adopt even when she had an express authority from her husband and even when the life of the husband was in danger of extinction. This rule led to much litigation. It finds no place under the new Act.

Related Articles

Difference between “Law of Contract” and “Consumer Protection Act, 1986” – Explained!

4. A contract is concluded between two persons known to each other, or at least concerned with one to other. 5. The aggrieved party has to incur huge money, and wait for long time for legal remedy. 6. No separate courts are established for the settlement of disputes under the law of contract. The aggrieved […]
Read more

What is ‘Acknowledgement of Paternity’ under Muslim Law?

Paternity of a child is established if the child is born during continuance of a valid marriage or within 280 days of its dissolution, the mother remaining unmarried. Maternity of a child is established in the woman who gives birth to the child; it is immaterial whether the child is an offspring of a valid […]
Read more
Search for:

I'm Rebecca!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out