What are the Characteristics of a Artificial / Juristic Person? – Explained!

1. A juristic person may be any subject-matter to which the law attributes a fictitious personality. There must exist a group of persons or mass of property as the case may be.

2. A juristic person is a legal creation. The group of persons or the mass in question is given the character of person either by means of (a) a general rule applicable wherever its conditions are satisfied, e.g., under the Companies Act, 1862, or by (b) a special Act of sover­eign power, e.g., an incorporating statute or charter.

A mere association of individuals does not form a legal person until the law recognises, over and above the associated individuals, a fictitious being which represent them but it is not identical with them.

Legal personality is a particular device by which the law creates units lo which it ascribes certain powers. One of the essential requirements of a legal personality is that the personality may, possess status.

The English law recognises two kinds of corporations, viz., corporation aggregate, e.g., a registered company, and corporation sole, e.g., the sovereign.

Different Types of Juristic Persons:

Professor Keeton ob­serves that the juristic person is the personifications of the sum total of legal rules applicable lo a plurality of persons. The conception of juristic personality involves a double fiction, at first by fiction we create a unity and then by a second fiction we attribute to it the wills of individual men. Salmond defines a juristic person as any subject- matter other than a human being to which the law attributes personal­ity.

Related Articles

Section 108 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Explained!

Therefore, when definition of abetment has been given where is the need to define abettor because one who abets should be an abettor. At the outset, therefore, it seems that a definition of ‘abettor’ should be unnecessary. But a careful reading of section 107 leads to the conclusion that such is not the case. The […]
Read more

Aftermath of Mahmud Ghazni’s Invasion of India

2. Mahmood’s invasions disclosed the military weakness of India. It hurt the political fabric deeply and exposed the disunity of the country to aggressors. Several dynasties were uprooted forever and thousands of brave soldiers were killed on the battlefield and those who survived were felt humiliated and demoralized. A great number of civilian people were […]
Read more
Search for: